Rethinking hybridity: From hybrid systems to assemblages
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15346/hc.v12i1.153Abstract
The term "system" in hybrid human–AI systems evokes the idea of humans and AI coming together forming a fixed, structured entity with clear boundaries and pre-defined functions. But if we examine how hybridity unfolds in everyday life from the perspectives of cultural anthropology and science and technology studies, we do not see systems, but rather constantly changing assemblages of heterogeneous elements, relations, and practices. This opinion paper proposes that using an assemblage thinking approach to understanding hybridity better accounts for human–AI entanglements in their everyday unfolding, offering a deeper insight into the various elements and dynamics contributing to them. This perspective implies (at least) three arguments. Firstly, hybridity is messy; Secondly, hybridity comes into being through joint practices; Thirdly, hybridity is constantly transforming. By using the notion of assemblage to better understand hybridity, this paper seeks to contribute to interdisciplinary collaborations in the analysis and development of human–AI hybrids.References
Akata, Z., Balliet, D., de Rijke, M., Dignum, F., Dignum, V., Eiben, G., Fokkens, A., Grossi, D., Hindriks, K., Hoos, H., Hung, H., Jonker, C., Monz, C., Neerincx, M., Oliehoek, F., Prakken, H., Schlobach, S., van der Gaag, L., van Harmelen, F., & van Hoof, H. (2020). A Research Agenda for Hybrid Intelligence: Augmenting Human Intellect With Collaborative, Adaptive, Responsible, and Explainable Artificial Intelligence. Computer, 53(8), 18–28. https://doi.org/10.1109/mc.2020.2996587
Anderson, B., Kearnes, M., McFarlane, C., & Swanton, D. (2012). On assemblages and geography. Dialogues in Human Geography, 2(2), 171–189. https://doi.org/10.1177/2043820612449261
Bader, R., Imam, A., Alnees, M., Adler, N., Ilia, J., Zugayar, D., Dan, A. and Khalaileh, A. (2024). REMOVED: Successful management of an Iatrogenic portal vein and hepatic artery injury in a 4-month-old female patient: A case report and literature review, Radiology Case Reports 19(6), 2106–2111.
Barad, K. (1996). Meeting the Universe Halfway: Realism and Social Constructivism without Contradiction. In L. Hankinson Nelson & J. Nelson (Eds.), Feminism, Science, and the Philosophy of Science (p. 161–194). Kluwer Academic Publishers; Springer. Barad, Karen. (2007). „Agential Realism: How Material-Discursive Practices Matter“. In Meeting the universe halfway: quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning, 132–85. Durham: Duke University Press.
Bareither, C. (2024). Cultures of Artificial Intelligence. AI Assemblages and the Transformations of Everyday Life. Zeitschrift Für Empirische Kulturwissenschaft, 2024(1), I–XIX. https://doi.org/10.31244/zekw/2024/01.31
Beck, S., Niewöhner, J., & Sørensen, E. (2012). Science and Technology Studies – Wissenschafts- und Technikforschung aus sozial- und kulturanthropologischer Perspektive. In Science and Technology Studies. Eine sozialanthropologische Einführung. (S. 9–48). Transcript.
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1972)
Conroy, G. (2023). Scientific sleuths spot dishonest ChatGPT use in papers. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-02477-w
De Landa, M. (2006). A New Philosophy of Society: Assemblage Theory and Social Complexity. Bloomsbury Academic.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (2013). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (1. paperback ed). Bloomsbury.
Dellermann, D., Calma, A., Lipusch, N., Weber, T., Weigel, S., & Ebel, P. (2019). The Future of Human-AI Collaboration: A Taxonomy of Design Knowledge for Hybrid Intelligence Systems. Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. https://doi.org/10.24251/hicss.2019.034
Hansen, L., & Koch, G. (2022). Assemblage – Constructing the Social in Empirical Cultural Research. Hamburger Journal für Kulturanthropologie (HJK), 14, 3–15
Haraway, D. (1991) ‘A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, technology, and Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century’ in Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature, New York: Routledge. (Original work published 1985)
Kamar, E. (2016). Directions in Hybrid Intelligence: Complementing AI Systems with Human Intelligence. Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-16), 4070–4073.
Lasecki, W. S. (2019). On Facilitating Human-Computer Interaction via Hybrid Intelligence Systems. Collective Intelligence, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA. http://www.wslasecki.com/pubs/hybridInteraction_CI2019.pdf
Latour, B. (1993). We Have Never Been Modern. Harvard University Press.
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford University Press. Law, J (2009). Actor Network Theory and Material Semiotics. In: Turner BS (ed) The new Blackwell companion to social theory. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, pp 141–158
Maletzki, C., Rietzke, E., & Bergmann, R. (2024). Empowering Large Language Models in Hybrid Intelligence Systems through Data-Centric Process Models. Proceedings of the AAAI Symposium Series, 3(1), 167–174. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaaiss.v3i1.31196 Müller, M (2015). Assemblages and Actor‐networks: Rethinking Socio‐material Power, Politics and Space. Geography Compass 9:27–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12192 Müller M, Schurr C (2016) Assemblage thinking and actor‐network theory: conjunctions, disjunctions, cross‐fertilisations. Trans Inst British Geog 41:217–229. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12117
Ong, A., & Collier, S. J. (Eds.). (2005). Global assemblages: Technology, politics, and ethics as anthropological problems. Blackwell Publishing. Oxford English Dictionary. (2023). hybrid, n. & adj. Oxford University Press; Oxford English Dictionary. https://doi.org/10.1093/OED/8459251414
Perrigo, B. (2023, January 18). Exclusive: OpenAI Used Kenyan Workers on Less than $2 per Hour to Make ChatGPT Less Toxic. Time. https://time.com/6247678/openai-chatgpt-kenya-workers/
Prakash, N., & Mathewson, K. W. (2020). Conceptualization and Framework of Hybrid Intelligence Systems. NeurIPS 2020 Workshop on Human And Model in the Loop Evaluation and Training Strategies. https://openreview.net/pdf/b2ded20e201d9d15a39193b3154342de7b6ef81a.pdf
Schatzki, T. R. (1996). Social practices : a Wittgensteinian approach to human activity and the social. Cambridge University Press.
Schwertl, M. (2013). Vom Netzwerk zum Text: Die Situation als Zugang zu globalen Regimen. In S. Hess, J. Moser, Johannes. M. Schwertl (Eds), Europäisch-ethnologisches Forschen. Neue Methoden und Konzepte. (p. 107–126) Dietrich Reimer Verlag. Suchman, Lucy. 2007. Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions. 2nd Edition. New York: Cambridge University Press. Veniamin Veselovsky, Manoel Horta Ribeiro, & West, R. (2023). Artificial Artificial Artificial Intelligence: Crowd Workers Widely Use Large Language Models for Text Production Tasks. ArXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2306.07899
Vepřek, L. H. (2023). Spielerisch helfen, «sinnvoll» zerstreuen? das bulletin. Für Alltag und Populäres. https://ekws.ch/de/bulletin/post/spielerisch-helfen-sinnvoll-zerstreuen
Vepřek, L. H. (2024a). A theoretical Framework for Emerging Hybrid Systems. In At the Edge of AI - Human Computation Systems and Their Intraverting Relations. (p. 50–78). Bielefeld: Transcript.
Vepřek, L. H. (2024b). At the Edge of AI - Human Computation Systems and Their Intraverting Relations. Transcript.
Vepřek, L. H.& Carlson, R. (2025). A hinge for ethnographic interventions in AI systems: Interlocking the past, present and future. In L. Koycheva, A. VandenBroek, & M. Artz (Eds.), Anthropology and AI. Routledge (forthcoming).
Welz, G. (2021). Assemblage. In P. Hinrichs, M. Röthl, & M. Seifert (Eds.), Theoretische Reflexionen. Perspektiven der Europäischen Ethnologie. (p. 161–176). Dietrich Reimer Verlag.
Young, R. J. C. (1995). Colonial Desire: Hybridity in Theory, Culture and Race. Routledge, London.
Zhang, M., Wu, L., Yang, T., Zhu, B. and Liu, Y. (2024). RETRACTED: The three-dimensional porous mesh structure of Cu-based metal-organic-framework - Aramid cellulose separator enhances the electrochemical performance of lithium metal anode batteries. Surfaces and Interfaces 46.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Lukas Griessl, Christoph Bareither, Libuše Hannah Vepřek
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
